....... ......

Home [  Back  ]

Islamic Verdicts - Volume I 

The Book of Knowledge

 

I acquire Books, but I do not read Them

Q: I am a man who has - all praise and thanks be to Allah - many beneficial books and reference works, yet I do not read them, instead, I choose just a few of them. Am I guilty of sin in keeping these books in my house, bearing in mind that some people borrow some of these books and benefit from them, after which, they return them to me?

A: There is no sin upon the Muslim in collecting beneficial books and keeping them with him in his library in order to refer to them, benefit from them, and to lend them to those who visit him among the educated people so that they might benefit from them. Nor is there any sin upon him if he does not refer to them much. As for lending them to reliable people, who benefit from them, this is a lawful action and a means of getting closer to Allah, the Most Glorified, since it supports the acquisition of knowledge and because this is included in the Words of Allah, the Most High: “Help you one another in Al-Birr and At-Taqwa (virtue, righteousness and piety)” (Al-Ma'idah 5: 2).

And the words of the Prophet (Salallahou ‘aleyhi wa salam): “Allah helps the worshipper so long as the worshipper helps his brother” (Muslim no. 2699).

Ibn Baz

 

I am a Teacher Who is asked Questions by the Students, should I answer?

Q: I am a teacher, a graduate from Intermediary College, «Islamic Studies Section, and I have studied a number of Fiqh books. What is the ruling in my case when I am asked questions by my students and I answer, according to my knowledge, that is, by way of Qiyas (Qiyas : Deduction by analogy) and Ijtihad, without going into the rulings of Haram and Halal?

A: You should refer to the books and Ijtihad and then answer in accordance with what you perceive to be correct, and there is no objection to you doing this. However, if you are in doubt about the answer and the correct position is not clear to you, then say: "I do not know," and promise them that you will look into the matter and after investigation, answer them, or refer the matter to the scholars in order to ascertain the truth.

Ibn Baz

 

Regarding Ijtihad and Formal Legal Rulings

Q: Is the door to Ijtihad in formulating Islamic rulings considered to be open to every person, or are there certain conditions which must be fulfilled by the Mujtahid And is it permissible for any person to rule according to his opinion, without knowledge of any clear evidence. And what is the grade of the Hadith which says: “I warn you against delivering legal rulings as I warn you against the Fire” (Ad-Darimi no. 157) or what carries the same meaning.

A: The door of performing Ijtihad in order to recognize the legal Islamic rulings remains open for those who are qualified to do it. They must have knowledge of Qur'anic Verses and Hadiths and be able to understand them, and to use them as evidence as required on the questions in which they are exercising Ijtihad. He must possess knowledge to the extent that he is able to cite relevant Hadiths on which there is consensus in all questions, so that they do not depart from the consensus of the Muslims (i.e. the scholars) in their judgements. They must have sufficient knowledge of Arabic language to allow them to understand the texts (of the Qur'an and Sunnah) and to derive and extract the proofs from them and then speak or deliver the ruling according to their convictions and what satisfies them in religion.

As for the Hadith: “I warn you against delivering legal rulings as I warn you against the Fire” (Ad-Darimi no. 157).

- it was narrated by Al-Hafiz 'Abdullah bin 'Abdur-Rahman Ad-Darimi in his Sunan, from 'Ubaidullah bin Abi Ja'far Al-Misri in Mursal form (Mursal: That is a chain of narration in which a Tabi'i reports from the Prophet (Salallahou ‘aleyhi wa salam), with no mention of any reporter   from among the Companions).And may peace and blessings be upon our Prophet, Muhammad and upon his family and Companions.

The Permanent Committee

 

There is no Objection to Citing Legal Judgements

Q: There is a teacher who is asked for legal rulings by his students and he has reasonably good knowledge. He is not qualified to give legal rulings, but he has heard the answers given by some reliable scholars to questions similar to those which he is asked. Is it therefore permissible for him to answer his students using these rulings, or is it necessary for him to attribute them to those who gave them?

A: If one who is unable to formulate legal judgements is asked, and he has memorized the rulings of reputable scholars, there is no objection for him to cite such rulings for them, but he should not attribute them to himself; instead, he should say: "I heard about so-and-so ruling such and such," so long as he has memorized them perfectly, without doubt. And Allah is the Granter of success.

Ibn Baz

 

The Ruling on seeking Islamic Knowledge

Q: Is a person excused for not seeking (Islamic) knowledge due to being busy with studies unconnected with Islamic knowledge, or because of work etc.?

A: The acquisition of Islamic knowledge is Fardh Kifayah -meaning that if enough people do so, it becomes a Sunnah for the rest of them. But the acquisition of knowledge could be Fardh 'Ain for all of the people - that is, if a person wanted to worship Allah through a certain act of worship, it would be incumbent upon him to know how to perform this act of worship to Allah. In view of this, if one were to occupy himself with something to the neglect of seeking Islamic knowledge, he and his family would be protected by learning what was sufficient for them, so long as they maintained the acts of worship which are an obligation upon them. We hold that this is excused and there is no objection to it, but he must learn as much Islamic law as is possible for him.

Ibn 'Uthaimin

 

The Four Mathhabs

Q: I do not know any of the four Mathhabs which I might follow, so is it permissible for me to choose any Mathhab?

A: The four Mathhabs agree upon the essentials, that is, in beliefs; they only differ over matters of Ijtihad in questions of Fiqh due to their different understanding and opinions on matters and differing degrees of knowledge. In spite of this, they are rewarded for their Ijtihad; whoever is right receives two rewards, while whoever is wrong receives one, and his mistake is forgiven, due to his good intention. It is therefore allowed for us to follow any of them in any matter except where it is clear that they are wrong, just as it is permitted to take the most preponderant view from every Mathhab.

Ibn Jibreen

 

If I enter a Religious Gathering, should I give Salutations?

Q: What is the best thing to do if a person arrives late for a lecture in College or a religious gathering and the teacher has already begun speaking, is it best to give salutations, or sit down without giving salutations?

A: It is better not to give salutations if this will interrupt the class, or cause annoyance to them. However, if it does not effect them, then giving salutations is a Sunnah for every person arriving at the gathering. In view of this, he should give salutations, and if any of those sitting answers him, it is sufficient.

Ibn 'Uthaimin

 

What reason is there for a scholar to hesitate to give a legal ruling?

Q: What reason is there for a scholar to hesitate to give a legal ruling?

A: A scholar may hesitate to give a legal ruling, if he is qualified to do so, and has knowledge, because the evidences that he has seem contradictory, or it could be that he feels that the questioner is not serious, as some questioners are not searching for the truth, they only want to play around, or to know the opinion of this scholar, and a second scholar, and a third scholar, etc. In such cases, the scholar may hesitate or refuse to answer the questioner who knows, if he feels it likely that he is playing around in order to see what the people (i.e. the scholars) say, or he wants to compare some of the sayings of the people (i.e. the scholars) with others - and this is worse, for he goes around saying: "The scholar so-and-so said such and such and the scholar so-and-so said such and such." These are some of the reasons why a scholar may hesitate to deliver a ruling.

Ibn 'Uthaimin

 

......